Search engine :
Return to the menu
| : /
Vote:
Results:
0 Votes
JANUARY 2022 - Volume: 97 - Pages: 58-63
Download pdf
There is currently an increasing demand for electric vehicles that require greater autonomy and energy efficiency when driving them. Control strategies in energy recovery systems are crucial to optimize the amount of energy returned to the battery and to ensure safety and stability for the user. In this paper, active fault tolerant control systems (AFTC) and passive fault tolerant control systems (PFTC) with otherspecialized control strategies (Fuzzy Logic, Neural Networks and Perturbation Rejection Controllers) are compared with classical PID controllers.The results of the simulations show that, keeping the battery voltage constant, returns of about 12% of the battery charge capacity are achieved while the braking time of the vehicles is reduced.
Share:
© Engineering Journal Dyna 2006 - Publicaciones Dyna, S.L
Official Science and Technology Body of the Federation of Industrial Engineers' Associations
Address: Unit 1804 South Bank Tower, 55 Upper Ground, London UK, SE1 9EY
Email: office@revistadyna.com
Regístrese en un paso con su email y podrá personalizar sus preferencias mediante su perfil
Name: *
Surname 1: *
Surname 2:
Email: *