Referee Name		
Phone		Email		
Affiliation / Company		
Address		

Paper title		
Evaluation Date		

PAPER CLASSIFICATION
Research
(Research Results)		Good practice
(Positive Experiences)		Review 
(State of the art)		Technical Report
(White Paper)		Opinion

ASSESSMENT FOR EDITOR
	5.- VERY	4.- QUITE	3.- MEDIUM	2. -LITTLE	1.- VERY LITTLE	
Original and innovative						
Useful or interesting						
Clear in the exhibition						
Scientific Rigor / reasoned conclusions
(Potential Impact Factor) 						
Technology Readiness Level: TRL
(See explanatory text below)	L10	L9	L8	L7	L6	L5	L4	L3	L2	L1	

GROUNDED JUSTIFICATION OF ASSESSMENT FOR EDITOR
Original and innovative:

Usefulness and interest:

Clear in the exhibition:

Scientific Rigor / reasoned conclusions (impact factor potential):

Technology Readiness Level (See text below): 

FINAL RECOMMENDATION TO THE EDITOR
Accepted:		Modify:		Recoverable Rejection:		Final Rejection:		

ASSESSMENT AND COMMENTS FOR AUTHOR

	

TECHNOLOGY READINESS LEVEL (TRL)

•	LEVEL 1 - Lowest level of technology readiness. Scientific research begins to be translated into applied research and development (R&D). Examples might include paper studies of a technology’s basic properties..
•	LEVEL 2 - Invention begins. Once basic principles are observed, practical applications can be invented. Applications are speculative, and there may be no proof or detailed analysis to support the assumptions. Examples are limited to analytic studies.
•	LEVEL 3 Active R&D is initiated. This includes analytical studies and laboratory studies to physically validate the analytical predictions of separate elements of the technology. Examples include components that are not yet integrated or representative.
•	LEVEL 4 - Basic technological components are integrated to establish that they will work together. This is relatively “low fidelity” compared with the eventual system. Examples include integration of “ad hoc” hardware in the laboratory.
•	LEVEL 5 - Fidelity of breadboard technology increases significantly. The basic technological components are integrated with reasonably realistic supporting elements so they can be tested in a simulated environment. Examples include “high-fidelity” laboratory integration of components.
•	LEVEL 6 - Representative model or prototype system, which is well beyond that of TRL 5, is tested in a relevant environment. Represents a major step up in a technology’s demonstrated readiness. Examples include testing a prototype in a high-fidelity laboratory environment or in a simulated operational environment.
•	LEVEL 7 - Prototype near or at planned operational system. Represents a major step up from TRL 6 by requiring demonstration of an actual system prototype in an operational environment (e.g., in an aircraft, in a vehicle, or in space).
•	LEVEL 8 - Technology has been proven to work in its final form and under expected conditions. In almost all cases, this TRL represents the end of true system development. Examples include developmental test and evaluation (DT&E) of the system in its intended weapon system to determine if it meets design specifications.
•	LEVEL 9 - Actual application of the technology in its final form and under mission conditions, such as those encountered in operational test and evaluation (OT&E). Examples include using the system under operational mission conditions.
A later step or LEVEL 10, would be the identification and/or implementation of improvement  deriving from its operation.
The proposals classified in levels 1 and 2, in the case of does not contain an appreciable originality, if appropriate, may be approved as collaborations.